Created by FindLaw's team of legal writers and editors | Last reviewed July 01, 2020
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
If a person is under attack and in fear for their life, they have the right to use force to protect themselves. Every state has self-defense laws that detail the circumstances under which an individual can use self-defense (and the limits of the force that may be used) to justify their conduct without being convicted of a crime.
About half of the states have some version of "stand your ground" laws. These laws don't require people to back down from an attacker even when withdrawal is possible. A common variation on this concept is the "castle doctrine" which allows individuals to defend themselves against threats in and to their homes (expanded in some states to include cars and/or workplaces) without the duty to retreat.
Missouri recognizes the "castle doctrine" and allows residents to use force against intruders, without the duty to retreat, based on the notion that your home is your "castle." This legal doctrine assumes that if an invader disrupts the sanctity of your home, they intend to do you harm and therefore you should be able to repel their advances.
Missouri's law is more extensive than the law in other states because it permits property owners to use the amount of force reasonably perceived as necessary, including deadly force.
However, case law suggests it does not go so far as permitting the use of deadly force to merely protect property. In 2016, the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District held in State v. Whipple that deadly force under the castle doctrine can only be used when you reasonably believe such force is necessary to protect yourself or someone else from "the use or imminent use of unlawful force."
Ultimately, it's an unclear issue that will likely need further clarification by the state judiciary or legislature.
While it's best to work with an attorney to fully comprehend the meaning of a statute, it's also useful to read a plain language version of the text to become familiar with the law. See the chart below for a short summary of Missouri's self-defense laws.
Statutes |
Missouri Revised Statutes: |
Justified Use of Force
|
Physical force:
Deadly force:
|
No Duty to Retreat |
A person has no duty to retreat:
|
Battered Spouse Syndrome Evidence |
Evidence that the actor was suffering from battered spouse syndrome is admissible regarding the issue of self-defense or defense of others. |
Note: State laws are always subject to change through the passage of new legislation, rulings in the higher courts (including federal decisions), ballot initiatives, and other means. While we strive to provide the most current information available, please consult an attorney or conduct your own legal research to verify the state law(s) you are researching.
If you or someone you know is charged with a crime where Missouri's self-defense laws can help to justify the actions, then it's important to get legal help. Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney who can determine whether Missouri's castle doctrine applies in your case or whether another defense strategy is appropriate.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Experienced Federal And State Attorneys Who Achieve The Best Possible Outcome For Every Case! Call Palmer Legal Defense Today!
Virtual Appointments
Get tailored advice and ask your legal questions. Many Missouri attorneys offer free consultations.
